Steven Chu Nominated to be Secretary of Energy

Steven Chu This is fantastic news. Steven Chu, director of the Lawrence Berkeley National Lab and 1997 Nobel Laureate in Physics for his work in laser cooling of atoms, has been nominated to be the next Secretary of Energy in the Obama administration. (Thanks to Elliot in comments.) This post is enormously important for science in general and physics in particular, as the DOE is responsible for much of the funding in physics and a lot of other R&D work. It’s also, needless to say, a crucial position for determining the country’s energy policy at a time when strong and imaginative leadership in this area is crucial.

I can’t imagine a pick for the job that would make me happier. Obviously Chu is a Nobel-prize-winning physicist, which is not bad. Almost as obviously, he’s an incredibly smart and creative guy. For evidence, look no further than his group’s web page at LBL. You’ll see atomic physics, for which he won the Nobel, but there are also very serious efforts in biophysics and polymer science, just because he thinks those things are interesting. (Apparently he has not devoted much thought to advanced HTML design.) I got to talk with him at the launch event for the Science and Entertainment Exchange — he also cares about the public perception of science — and it’s clear that he has a wide-ranging, creative intellect, which is what we need to tackle the problems of energy production over the years to come. Chu has recently become intensely concerned about the challenge of global warming, and is serious about doing something to fix things. He and Craig Venter are teaming up to make microorganisms that turn carbon dioxide into strawberry ice cream, or something like that. I wouldn’t bet against them.

Let’s be clear: just because Chu is an accomplished physicist, this doesn’t mean that researchers should expect a bonanza of new funds. The previous administration has left the budget and the economy in shambles, and nominating a Nobel Laureate to head DOE doesn’t magically bring new money into existence. But it means the hard choices that inevitably will be made will be made intelligently by people who understand the significance of what is going on. We can never ask for more than that.

Here is Steven Chu talking about Science Debate 2008. Berkeley’s loss is Washington’s gain, but in this case the country will be better off for it.

45 Comments

45 thoughts on “Steven Chu Nominated to be Secretary of Energy”

  1. He and Craig Venter are teaming up to make microorganisms that turn carbon dioxide into strawberry ice cream

    Just make sure Leon Kass doesn’t get wind of this, or that any consumption of the ice cream happens in private!

  2. Even as a person to did not vote for Obama (I voted for Nader), I have to admit this is more than just a good choice by Obama.

  3. I met Obama’s designated domestic adviser Melody Barnes, and will email her that I and lots of scientists think Chu was a good choice.

    Now, an energy question coming up in letters to Newsweek (12/15) – Glenn Sjoden at UF claims that reprocessing of nuclear fuel is relatively easy and done by other nations (like France and Japan) except the US – is he right? Is it really a good idea?

  4. Seems like every piece of paper coming out of LBL these days has a picture of Dr. Chu on it. I for one will welcome seeing other faces.

  5. This is the best news I’ve heard since November 4th, and the second-best all year. This is one President who will actually listen to scientists – during a cabinet meeting!

  6. Awesome! I went out to dinner with him last year, he’s a fantastic person with wide interests and hopefully an accomplished administrator.

  7. WOW!! What a brilliant choice. If someone could only ignore the failures of the Bush Administation regarding Iraq, Katrina, the Justice Department and the Economic Collapse, they might find that history will show that the failure to listen to the scientific community in regards to Climate Change will be the biggest failure of all.

    I didn’t know who Steven Chu was until a few hours ago. Since then, I’ve watched interviews, speaches and read numerous testamonials. Intially, my impression of Steven Chu is that he is a brilliant scientist who also possesses the gifts of comunication skills, critical thinking skills, exemplry leadership skills and and charning sense of humor.

  8. To be fair, the current DOE director, while not the superstar that Dr. Chu is, is also a physicist with impressive academic credentials.

  9. Seems like Samuel Bodman (current Secretary of Energy) is not a physicist and is in fact more of a corporate administrator than a scientist (but was a chemical engineering prof.)

    http://www.whitehouse.gov/government/bodman-bio.html

    “A financier and executive by trade, with three decades of experience in the private sector…”

    I am very pro Steve Chu (also happens to be a former prof. at my University 😉 )

  10. We picked the right president; he turns around and assembles a great team of problem solvers. The future looks quite a bit brighter. Cheers!

  11. Pingback: Obama's science posts

  12. Pingback: 135. Steven Chu is the Secretary of Energy

  13. My-Name-is-Kenneth

    I’ve somehow been shunted into a parallel universe, right? One where the US President is intelligent and aware and he makes choices for his cabinet posts based on competence rather than cronyism.

    Eight years under the thumbs of the Village Idiot and Darth Vader have taken a certain toll. Let us hope America is never that dumb again.

    I know, I know. But I had to say it anyway.

  14. Low Math, Meekly Interacting

    Marvelous news!

    I echo the bittersweet realization about the loss to public science, though. The work his lab is doing on the spatial and temporal determinants of promotor activity is exactly the sort of stuff the field needs to move the understanding of the “language” of transcriptional control forward toward full comprehension. I’m sure he’ll see to it he has a capable successor, though.

  15. This is excellent news. He can start by doing a thorough review of the grant process and the people who work on it. Perhaps you know, hiring people who actually understand a little physics rather than giving grants based on who has the best cover letter and use of buzzwords.

  16. If we’re doing stimulus packages wouldn’t getting money out there to hire new professors and do research be something that would get money into the system faster than infrastructure spending and also have even better long term consequences?

    Yes Bush was clueless about science at times. (Even many conservatives were angry about that) But lowering expectations about science seems wrong. It really doesn’t take a whole lot to increase funding. Especially if it’s just increasing the budgets of the NIH or NSF.

  17. Pingback: Steven Chu as head of DOE : Mormon Metaphysics

  18. As a big Obama supporter, I have said for a long time that the people he brings into the government will be the determining factor of his success, and that he would bring in people that were fit for the job. With one very Large exception, he has done just that. I’ve never heard Dr. Chu’s name before today, but after reading a part of his autobiography, and information on the internet, as well as the accolades above, I congratulate Barack Hussein Obama on an excellent choice.

  19. Dr. Chu’s energy research is entirely funded by British Petroleum, through a controversial $500 million dollar contract with UC Berkeley and Lawrence Berkeley Labs (as well as the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign). The emphasis at the BP-created initiative is mainly on biofuels, which are not universally considered the best answer by the scientific community and have been largely panned by the environmental community. The deal has come under heavy criticism for potentially ensuring that a major oil company will be setting much of the agenda for energy research in the coming century (not to mention setting the agenda for the public universities involved). Not an entirely evil enterprise, perhaps, but hardly free of distortion by economic interests. And Dr. Chu was a major force creating the deal. So not to rain on anyone’s parade, but just to add a little perspective. This appointment is very much in the mold of other Obama appointments: Super-smart, super-qualified guy – but no progressive.

Comments are closed.

Scroll to Top