The electron, muon, and tau are in two ways in a hierarchical relation to each other:
There is decay mode: tau and muon undergo decay. Tau decay produces either a muon or an electron, with the decay mode that produces an electron being the most probable. (And of course the decay additionally produces neutrino’s in accordance with conservation constraints.) The electron doesn’t have a decay mode available.
For all three, electron, muon and tau: the amount of inertial mass of each has been determined by way of experiment.
To my understanding: neutrino detection finds three neutrino flavors, in such a way that it can be inferred that for the three electron flavors there are corresponding neutrino flavors.
But then: for the neutrinos the flavor state and the mass state are not correlated.
It would appear that none of the three flavors of neutrino has a decay mode.
So that is very different from electron, muon, and tau.
Lower limit
A lower limit for neutrino mass is not known. There is the Karlsruhe Tritium Neutrino Experiment (KATRIN), and for years now the KATRIN results have been pushing down the lower limit of neutrino mass.
Neutrino mass
There is a prominent candidate for the origin of neutrino mass, but as of now other candidates cannot be excluded.
In all the impression that I get is that description of the properties of neutrino’s is very much tentative.
What puzzles me:
How can particle physicists be so confident that in order to be capable of cycling through flavor states neutrino’s must have inertial mass? Given all the unknows, how does it come about that for that particular correlation particle physicists are certain of it?