Episode 10: Megan Rosenbloom on the Death Positive Movement

We're all going to die. But while we are alive, it's up to us how we understand and deal with that fact. In the United States especially, there is a tendency to not face up to the reality of death, and to assume that our goal should be to struggle at all costs to squeeze every last minute out of life. The Death Positive movement aims to change that, helping people to both face up to death on a personal and cultural level, and to give themselves more control over the manner of their own deaths. One of the leaders in this movement is today's guest, Megan Rosenbloom, who works as a medical librarian by day. We talk about attitudes toward death around the world, the differences between dying at home and in a hospital, the importance of autonomy in old age, and how individuals and societies can cope with the ultimate inevitability that comes with being alive.

Megan Rosenbloom received a Masters from the University of Pittsburgh in 2008, and is currently Associate Director for Instruction Services at the Norris Medical Library of the University of Southern California. In 2016 she won a Mover & Shaker award from Library Journal. She is active in the Death Positive movement, serving as the co-founder and director of the Death Salon. She is currently working on a book about the history of books bound with human skin.

Download Episode

10 thoughts on “Episode 10: Megan Rosenbloom on the Death Positive Movement”

  1. Beautiful podcast. Great movement. Simply thought out. As a person who has seen quite a few deaths from a young age I think for dealing with death (ones own and loved ones) “existentialist philosophy” helps. We are born,we live ,thus we die. In order to keep religion out of the process one can just look it at from the point of view as -my atoms are just losing/beginning to lose structure, and returning to the universe in unstructured form.

  2. I thought this was an interesting topic, but there was “chirping” or some kind of high pitch noise in the background for most of this that made me stop listening half way through.

  3. I am deeply triggered by this but I know trolling won’t get me anywhere. In any case have you heard of David Benatar? Regardless you should have him on. FYI the idea of a life well lived is an absurd concept.

  4. I wonder if people would choose to have a book bound with their skin after death, what book would they pick?

  5. I’ll admit,I’m not yet a supporter so maybe it’s wrong for me to complain about not optimizing sound quality, but it was difficult to listen to this podcast in my car with the extra noise. I had to pause every so often just to reassure myself that I wasn’t about to slip a belt. Otherwise, huge fan; keep up the great work!

  6. “Train yourself to hold that death is nothing to us, because good and evil consist in sensation, and death is the removal of sensation. A correct understanding that death is nothing to us makes the mortality of life enjoyable — not because it gives you an unbounded span of time, but because it removes the desire for immortality. There is nothing terrifying in life to someone who truly understands that there is nothing terrifying in the absence of life.” – Epicurus

  7. While a great topic your guest came across as too “young” and insincere- maybe just my age
    Have enjoyed the majority of your podcasts

  8. Thank you for another great episode! I really enjoyed your conversations. I like how Megan argues that we should think a little more about ideas that make us uncomfortable, and interact with this discomfort more often.

  9. I could not disagree more. In a couple of hundred years, once we learn to extend lifespans considerably, humans will look back on our current cultural norm of thinking “it is wise to be alright with death” to be one of the craziest ideas humans have ever entertained. People will look back on our lack of funding into life-extension research to be a moral disgrace.

    This death-positive movement is potentially harmful in that it encourages a general attitude that life-extension research is not of crucial importance.

    It is not alright to be alright with death.

  10. Why the derision and laughter at typical American burial rituals but seeming reverence for every other country or culture’s practices? Seems like scholarly people would be curious about the origins and evolution of any of the thousands practices of dealing with the dead throughout time.

Comments are closed.

Scroll to Top