Untitled Thomas Pynchon

Post horn The rumors are apparently true: Thomas Pynchon has a new book coming out, scheduled for release on December 5 of this year. We know they’re true because the book already has an amazon.com page where you are welcome to buy it. As Slate notes, an intriguing aspect of the story (you knew there would be one, didn’t you?) is the appearance — followed soon thereafter by the disappearance — of an “author blurb” on the amazon page. Here it is, rescued from the amazon discussion board.

“Spanning the period between the Chicago World’s Fair of 1893 and the years just after World War I, this novel moves from the labor troubles in Colorado to turn-of-the-century New York, to London and Gottingen, Venice and Vienna, the Balkans, Central Asia, Siberia at the time of the mysterious Tunguska Event, Mexico during the Revolution, postwar Paris, silent-era Hollywood, and one or two places not strictly speaking on the map at all.

With a worldwide disaster looming just a few years ahead, it is a time of unrestrained corporate greed, false religiosity, moronic fecklessness, and evil intent in high places. No reference to the present day is intended or should be inferred.

The sizable cast of characters includes anarchists, balloonists, gamblers, corporate tycoons, drug enthusiasts, innocents and decadents, mathematicians, mad scientists, shamans, psychics, and stage magicians, spies, detectives, adventuresses, and hired guns. There are cameo appearances by Nikola Tesla, Bela Lugosi, and Groucho Marx.

As an era of certainty comes crashing down around their ears and an unpredictable future commences, these folks are mostly just trying to pursue their lives. Sometimes they manage to catch up; sometimes it’s their lives that pursue them.

Meanwhile, the author is up to his usual business. Characters stop what they’re doing to sing what are for the most part stupid songs. Strange sexual practices take place. Obscure languages are spoken, not always idiomatically. Contrary-to-the-fact occurrences occur. If it is not the world, it is what the world might be with a minor adjustment or two. According to some, this is one of the main purposes of fiction.

Let the reader decide, let the reader beware. Good luck.”

–Thomas Pynchon

Did Pynchon really write this blurb? Why did amazon remove it? (I’m guessing that it was written by an overly enthusiastic publicist, and that’s why they removed it.) Is it true that Russian mathematician Sofia Kovalevskaya will play a prominent role in the new book? What is the title, for crying out loud? Wondering is half the fun.

The notoriously reclusive Pynchon is fond of sprinkling science throughout his works, and scientists are fond of reading them in turn. Gravity’s Rainbow, his masterwork, has a well-deserved reputation for being somewhat intimidating. But I would encourage anyone to read Mason & Dixon, his most recent book and arguably his most entertaining (not that it’s a breeze, mind you). Admittedly, there are scary parts:

“Gentlemen,” advises this ominous Shadow, “— you have fallen, willy-nilly, among a race who not only devour Astronomers as a matter of habitual Diet, but may also make of them vile minature ‘Sandwiches,’ and then lay them upon a mahogany Sideboard whose Price they never knew, and then forget to eat them. Your only hope, in this room, is to impersonate so perfectly what they assume you to be, that instincts of Predation will be overcome by those of Boredom.”

My most important contribution (to date) to literary scholarship is the discovery of the subtle deployment in M&D of the collapse of the wavefunction as a metaphorical theme for the progress of the surveyors over the hills to the West, observing as they go and reducing Probabilities to Certainties.

Update: according to a followup article in Slate, the title of the novel is Against the Day, and the blurb is really written by Pynchon. Shows you what I know.

14 Comments

14 thoughts on “Untitled Thomas Pynchon”

  1. The blurb is almost too Pynchonesque; it seems likely he would do something like this, then ask for it to be removed, so that later he can do it again. But Tesla as a cameo in a work that dances on the early days of the global egalitarian hope inspired by electricity seems pretty damn inticing. And no, of course this book would not be in anyway metaphoric or allegoric with reference to anything happening today in the 21st century, never.

  2. It seems precisely too Pynchonesque, which is why I’m guessing that it’s not him. If you read his essays, e.g. the intro to Slow Learner, he doesn’t really sound like that at all when he’s not writing fiction. “The author is up to his usual business” seems especially fake to me.

    Of course, it would be just like him to play a joke by writing in the style of someone who was trying to write like him. An object lesson in the self-justifying logic of paranoia.

  3. Ah, good old Py, author of the most pretentious pile of crap since Finnegan’s Wake. Takes me back to my grad student days, when everyone played bridge, pretended to read Proust and to be connoisseurs of fine cigars…..

  4. Did you forget the part about Ayn Rand’s Fountainhead changing people’s lives? Or was that just in my college’s pretentious crap pile?

  5. I’ve only made it a quarter of the way through GR, with a concordance. When I started reading Pynchon, someone recommended the following order: The Crying of Lot 49, V, then Gravity’s Rainbow (this recommendation was before Vineland and M&D). I haven’t read Vineland yet, but I would insert M&D after V, with the caveat that if you don’t like V, you should read M&D anyway, as it’s completely amazing.

    While I’m giving out unsolicited literary advice… If you like M&D, I also recommend Neal Stephenson’s Baroque Cycle and The Illuminatus! Trilogy, by Robert Shea and Robert Anton Wilson.

  6. Pingback: enthusiasm » Blog Archive » The New Thomas Pynchon (further)

  7. According to the wikipedia article on Pynchon, the new books is entitled Against the Day. The source is of course questionable, but better than nothing, no?

  8. Dear me, a mention of Mason and Dixon on a physics blog that doesn’t mention the name of the boatswain? It’s a vile pun, but I’m fond of it anyway.

  9. James Duckworth

    I’m just glad he is back with a formidable sounding posthorn of a book! December should be fun reading time! Roll on Pynchonalia, I say! James

  10. Pingback: Cosmic Variance

  11. Pingback: Not Even Wrong » Blog Archive » Media and Other News

  12. Pingback: Inherent Vice | Cosmic Variance | Discover Magazine

  13. Pingback: Thomas Pynchon: Internet Marketer? | Bookish Us

Comments are closed.

Scroll to Top