Q: Why is fundamentalist Christianity better than string theory?
A: Because it makes testable predictions.
Here is a prediction, from none other than Sarah Palin: God will intervene on Election Day.
In an interview posted online Wednesday, Sarah Palin told Dr. James Dobson of “Focus on the Family” that she is confident God will do “the right thing for America” on Nov. 4.
Dobson asked the vice presidential hopeful if she is concerned about John McCain’s sagging poll numbers, but Palin stressed that she was “not discouraged at all.”
“To me, it motivates us, makes us work that much harder,” she told the influential Christian leader, whose radio show reaches millions of listeners daily. “And it also strengthens my faith because I know at the end of the day putting this in God’s hands, the right thing for America will be done, at the end of the day on Nov. 4.”
…
She also thanked her supporters — including Dobson, who said he and his wife were asking “for God’s intervention” on election day — for their prayers of support.
“It is that intercession that is so needed,” she said. “And so greatly appreciated. And I can feel it too, Dr. Dobson. I can feel the power of prayer, and that strength that is provided through our prayer warriors across this nation. And I so appreciate it.”
Admittedly, not a very good testable prediction. I doubt that we’ll see wholesale conversion to atheism on November 5th if Obama wins. More likely, we will be told that this is just an exceptionally subtle part of God’s plan. It’s like predicting supersymmetry at the LHC!
I went on a brief trip to Ireland and England a couple of weeks ago. You know what they couldn’t stop talking about? Sarah Palin. And religious Americans more generally. This pretty much sums up why:
I understand that later on in the interview, Tracy claims that the bit in the Gospels about loving your neighbors was “probably inserted by Communists,” and she raised her eyebrows so high that her eyeballs popped completely out of her head.
I thought it might be worthwhile -as a Christian, by the way- to clarify some of the relevant information.
“God’s intervention”
From a Christian perspective this is almost an oxymoron. God is omnipotent and the whole construction of the world; all events and the entirety of history are fore-ordained. Thus the result of election day is in fact already determined. Whether or not it is in the Republicans’ favour is not important. Personally, were I an American citizen and of voting age, I would vote Democrat.
“an exceptionally subtle part of God’s plan”
I sort of covered this above. Nevertheless, just because Sarah Palin thinks it is God’s will for her party to win does not mean that it is so. Nor would it necessarily be the best result.
“probably inserted by communists”
That seems unlikely but there are certain aspects of Communism that even Christians should admire. Other aspects not so much.
-separation of church and state
Yes, I believe for a Christian, a Christian world view should tint their election choices as well as other choices. Nevertheless when a politician tries to sell me my religion I am always suspicious.
-fanatic atheism
Its already been said but it bears repetition. Fundamentalism is dogmatic insistence on core tenets of a belief system. For a Christian this boils down to the truth of the bible, for an atheist it’s not that different. There are many laws to which you abide, foremost that there is not and cannot be a god.
-Science for Christians
I think with a proper understanding of the bible you will find that it is not incompatible with science. If you could prove to me beyond doubt that it was, I would cease being a Christian. There would be no point.
That seems to be all that’s relevant and bit extra for now.
Methalos
Pingback: Barack Obama Responds to Divisive Politics « blueollie
You learn something every day. I always assumed everyone over here was fascinated in Sarah Palin because of her famous father, Michael, who used to be in Monty Python’s Flying Circus.
Ok Methalos, the passages which present words like, “Fore-ordained”, Predestined, Fore-know,” etc, are ALL used in the writer’s context; service in the ministry of the Kingdom of God on Earth — which always involves Israel in some way.
You said —
“God’s intervention”
From a Christian perspective this is almost an oxymoron. God is omnipotent and the whole construction of the world; all events and the entirety of history are fore-ordained. Thus the result of election day is in fact already determined.
You have taken a biblical truth regarding God’s Kingdom and “assumed” to know exactly how God’s dealings with global matters works.
Tell me, is it possible that God seeing all things in the timeline of humanity saw the American 2008 election and determined to NOT do anything regarding it ??
The fact is “Christians” would do well to learn from Job and not attempt to explain God, nor His reasons and methods of dealing with mankind’s lives.
No one can say with certainty that God has acted in any way for or on behalf of, this upcoming election, to say He has is to assume to know what God did NOT reveal in His revelation.
You thoughts are a prime example of “String Theology”.
Methalos, you’re missing the point. Sure, there are a few extremely outspoken atheists who are convinced they can prove there is no god, but that number is vanishingly small, especially compare to the number of outspoken Christians who believe they can prove there is a God (there are whole denominations of them in America).
But just look at these “core tenets” you mention. On the Christian side, you have a supernatural being (God), whom you worship, you have holy scripture (the Bible) that contains hundreds of laws and commandments on how to conduct all aspects of your daily lives, and you have dozens of creeds, statements of faith, all of which unite large groups of people into organized sects and denominations.
On the atheist side? Well, it’s a given that atheists don’t believe there is a God, and I suppose it follows that we believe that you should look elsewhere for guidance on how to live our lives. But that’s all there is. There are not “many laws” by which we abide (unless you mean the law of the state, but we all abide by those, including all religious people, unless you want to risk arrest and punishment).
You say for a Christian boils down to the “truth in the Bible” and that for atheists it’s not that different. But apart from agreeing that we don’t believe there is a God, what is the equivalent for atheists? There is nothing in atheism that demands proof of no God, nor that we should convert people to non-belief. There are no atheist laws or commandments to follow, no prescribed political agenda, nobody telling us how we’re supposed to live our lives. Sure there are books written by atheists who have their own opinions on such things, but to equate that with the creeds of Christianity is to sorely miss the point.
(Sean, sorry I got “carried away”. I’ve counted to 13 comments, so I hope this is okay. 😉 )
TZ, thank you very much. This is exactly my point:
EU = secularized
U.S. secularized
“God’s intervention – Thus the result of election day is in fact already determined. Whether or not it is in the Republicans’ favour is not important.”
This kind of mumbo-jumbo scares me, and makes me feel sad. Why vote at all? Why not start the United States of Christian Dictatorship right away?
Some try to tell me what I’m proud for and not, with the conclusion that I love EU and hate U.S.
It’s wrong. I love America (except right-wing Christians). America gave the world blues, jazz, rock ‘n’ roll, soul music, hamburgers, moon trips, space programs, new technology, science, the brightest brains in the world and everything that is modern.
That’s why I’m worried that America will make a disastrous mistake mccain, sorry *again*, after eight years with GWB.
It’s time to stop the American path toward medieval mumbo-jumbo before it’s too late.
U.S. <> secularized
er…I think there may be a few problems with your list Mr Gonzalez.
I’ll grant you blues, jazz and rock’n’roll….but America gave the world science ?
I didn’t know that Newton, Galileo, Einstein, Darwin, etc etc were all American.
I’ll accept that America probably has many of the brightest brains in the world but I think many of them moved to the states from elsewhere so in this sense America didn’t give them, it took them.
You’re even on thin ice with hamburgers which are named after Hamburg, a place in Germany.
Speedy,
you forgot “Country Music”…. A unique American cultural contribution to be sure.
e.
Pingback: links for 2008-10-23 | Yostivanich.com
Sorry guys, I’m not allowed to answer. I have to wait for at least 5 comments … 🙁
Palin’s prediction that God will do the right thing, to me, clearly implies that she believes the right thing is a McCain/Palin win. It’s not a general prediction that whoever wins is God’s choice. She means, “we’re God’s choice and we should win.” Anyone disagree?
Methalos,
I think your key mistake about atheists (and I am one) is captured in your comment:
“There are many laws to which you abide, foremost that there is not and cannot be a god.”
The “cannot” belongs to religion, not atheism. Atheists (as far we can be regarded as group – I personally don’t go any meetings or ceremonies…) do not have any “faith” in the non-existance of god, instead we just make up our minds as best we can using the available evidence and the tools of reasoning that seem to have worked over the years.
There could well still be be a god, but he/she/it would have a lot to answer for (especially if Palin gets elected..)
After thinking more about this, the only conclusion I can reach is that I really wish you hadn’t posted the video. It makes me extremely uncomfortable to know that these people are out there.
I can only hope that PBS returns to her home on election night so we can all watch as she realizes that, oops, the Lord let her down – and that, despite her objections, we do indeed have a “President O-ba-ma.”
The GOP politician’s prayer:
The Lord is my shephard;
I shall not want.
He make my ballot name shine forth
He leads me besides electronic bliss.
He restores my campaign,
He leads me in the paths of
electoral victory
for His name sake
Yea, though I walk through the valley
of the shadow of Democrats
I will fear no Obama,
for Diebold is with me.
Your vote switching black boxes,
they comfort me.
We are getting lots of strange stuff about white voter’s last minute reluctance and the like. This stuff about God’s intervention is maybe meant to placate true believers enough so they ignore the blatant election fraud, and FOXNEWS will obviously focus in on voter reluctance. The rest of us will be told to shut up, a’la O’Reilly.
Lawrence B. Crowell
In fact I think the vast majority of people on this planet believe that the earth is at the center of the universe, and a large portion believe that the positioning of heavenly bodies directly impacts their lives. Unfortunately the universe is not amenable to majority rule. Though somewhere in the multiverse you might be able to find and environment where the laws of nature change based on popular demand!
Once upon a time, there might have been a social benefit to monotheism, e.g. its ability to organize large numbers of people without much back talk. Monotheism was a “trait” selected for by social pressures of the time.
I think, though, that we’re on the cusp of an enormous social revolution, one in which atheism is the trait that social pressures will select for. Monotheism posits some universal observer who knows all things. In atheism, there is a much bigger incentive to see things for ourselves, because there is nobody else to see them if we don’t. Monotheism posits a downward projection of morality, determined arbitrarily before humanity began. Atheism suggests that the best morals are those which usefully uphold the values dear to one’s self.
As a social trait, atheism is infinitely more curious and flexible than monotheism.
And this is why atheism will never be dominant. There will always be humans who believe that some values are, or should be, universal – even at the expense of themselves.
There are many good things about the robust independence and personal growth associated with Atheism. I think Americans have been poorly served by their local interpretations of Christianity, which has been seriously warped by the consumer culture and militaristic nationalism. Lay Christianity in the West is sadly infantilised and glib. I agree that we’re on the cusp of an enormous social revolution, but one in which EXTREME WEALTH is NO LONGER the trait that social pressures will select for.
Fundamentalism is based on certain erroneous assumptions about the Bible and the world…
a) Every word is directed to the 21st century Western Christian reader
b) Every verse in Genesis is a literal scientific observation (but don’t worry about imagery such as Ezekiel, Joel, Daniel, Revelation)
c) The 21st century Western Christian lay reader is able to interpret the Bible infallibly by the inspiration of the Holy Spirit
d) There’s a lot to be afraid of in the big bad non Christian world, just keep buying Joel Osteen books and you’ll be OK
e) Fill your soul with junk from the Christian subculture… don’t question anything or be TOO honest
Perhaps in the coming decades people will discard their idiotic religious trappings altogether. I hope that the church evolves away from its monolithic soul-crushing religion, into a more homespun, humble, genuine, engaged, and spiritual faith.
“from none other than Sarah Palin: God will intervene on Election Day.”
If Obama gets in ? Dang maybe she`s right .
the joke that opened this post is the funniest thing I’ve seen in a long time.
unfortunately, then the rest of hte thread happened
I like the opening joke. Unfortunately, I’m pretty sure the outcome will be god’s will regardless.
“God always answers your prayers- it’s just that sometimes the answer in ‘no!'”.